We don't choose who we are, but we do choose who we become.
There’s a riot of information racing by, and to survive, we snatch little bits and then magnify them into what we embrace as the full picture. Nuance? No time for nuance.
Every interaction might be the whole thing.
信息喧嚣着飞驰而过，为了生存，我们粗鲁的抓取着零碎的信息，将它们放大为我们拥抱的全景。细节？无暇体验细节。
每个互动都可能代表全部。
via Seth Godin
How many countries ARE THERE REALLY?
我讨厌这种毫无网页标准可言的网页，但有时候，它们能告诉你联合国与维基百科都懒得告诉你的事实。绝对有趣的阅读，只要你别那么在意湾娘的回归。
We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn
Openness and transparency are essential character traits of the Internet economy and should be embraced by governments as necessary components to deal with issues of privacy, security and active inclusive participation.
这是对荷兰政府商务部找RAND做的有关互联网经济政策的建议书，又一篇某国政府不会去读的论文。正在和有志向参与网络经济的旅客不妨看看，即便我们暂时无福享受如此礼遇，它仍是一股无法回避的改革潮流。
via RAND
But there are others who think the experiment isn’t over, that the Back Door still has vital lessons to teach about democracy and rule of law. Perhaps China still needs a few rebels – at a safe distance, of course.
via The Atlantic （全文以及互动版）
标题或许很感性，但内容是很理性的一篇文章，本文回顾与分析了游戏业发展近40年使用过的帮助玩家的地图与导航设计。8月份刊载之后我一直很想翻译，却始终找不到时间。这次再搜果然有人抢先了，既然如此就推荐阅读吧。
No More Wrong Turns（中文翻译，质量不错的一篇）
PS：真是可惜的要命，好好的译文发在3DM和Levelup，唉，都是被转载新闻和盗版下载宠坏的用户，对长文毫无兴趣也在意料之中。就算是比较有“内涵”的a9vg，也是没几个人搭上话，我们的“论坛”到底在论什么？