什么叫做“政治化”

既然秦刚和猫咪回答不了，问slashdotter吧——

The real issue here is corporate espionage, fair play in Chinese market, trade issues, etc.

The next big thing is due out on April 15th. No, not your taexs. The Treasury department is due to release its biannual report on cheating trade nations. Even though China should have been on that list semi-permanently for a decade or more the US has always allowed them to slide. The big question is whether they allow it again this time. If China goes on the list it the first step to trade sanctions and possibly tariffs on Chinese goods. If you read the new lately China is screaming bloody murder and throwing every smoke bomb in their arsenal out to the press.

So yeah, this show is becoming interesting but it going to be much bigger than Google.

美国会不会绕过WTO进行大规模贸易制裁？中国是否坚持人民币低汇率追求高GDP与贸易顺差？这才是“政治化”的根本，用在谷歌身上是外交部已经想不到也没空想更好的借口了。

衍生阅读：路透社的报道，联合早报的报道。

相关文章:

Author: 店长

The Master of BitInn

5 thoughts on “什么叫做“政治化””

  1. Not on topic, but…

    I wonder what is his defintion of a “cheating” trade nation? Control of the value of your currency is but one form of macroeconomic policy that can be implemented to protect your country’s trade. It is in effect no different to the numerous tariffs or other protectionist economic policies that the US liberally employ. Is the US also cheating?

    I find that when it comes to commentary on international relations most people simply cannot maintain a neutral stance. It’s always “We are right and you are wrong”, and this was the case even with wars up to the Vietnam War.

    1. cheating is obviously a matter of perspective, the official word is “currency manipulator”, calling your trade partner “manipulator” is one step from declaring trade war. Which I don’t think U.S. would do under current economic atmosphere…

      international relation often affects one’s core interest, unless you are a neutral third party. with emerging global economics, finding such a person is provenly hard.

    1. 以前有读过一些文章，全文leak昨天看过一下。
      我至今没搞清楚他们将怎么在不知会民众的情况下完成最终立法，例如要求海外ISP提供用户个人资料，或者更夸张的边检电脑搜查。

      不过ACTA的最终目的是很明确的，保证IP在这些国家之间得到相互保障。回收用户自由补充生产力不足造成的经济泡沫（生产力到了人力成本低的国家）。

      目前我看不到“金砖四国”加入的理由，“最终目标”是否可能实现，得看这四个国家的知识产权发展速度……

Comments are closed.